Friday, May 26, 2017

Unvaccinated Children Have Much Lower Rates of Chronic Illness, Jackson State Study Find

Alois Kolar

The first peer-reviewed study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated children versus unvaccinated was recently published in the Journal of Translational Science by epidemiologists from the School of Public Health at Jackson State University. The study’s conclusions are likely to inflame the fierce debate over whether vaccines and a mercury-containing vaccine preservative may be culprits in the dramatic rise in certain neurodevelopmental disorders in our children, including autism.The “Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children” implicates vaccines in a host of chronic illnesses now epidemic in our nation’s children. The team of scientists, led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Anthony Mawson, the author of more than fifty published studies, concluded that “In a final adjusted model designed to test for this possibility, controlling for the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination, the following factors remained significantly associated with NDD: vaccination (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.6), nonwhite race (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.4), and male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.4). Preterm birth itself, however, was not significantly associated with NDD, whereas the combination (interaction) of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5) (Table 8).” Jackson State is a leading university research center.


The study suggests that fully vaccinated children may be trading the prevention of certain acute illnesses (chicken pox, pertussis) for more chronic illnesses and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) like ADHD and Autism.

In order to find a large population of children who had not received any vaccines, the Jackson State scientists utilized Homeschool organizations in four states and compared the incidence of a broad range of health outcomes in 666 children, 39% of whom were unvaccinated. Among the more concerning findings, vaccinated children had increased risks of autism (4.2 times), ADHD (4.2 times), learning disabilities (5.2 times) eczema (2.9 times), and an astounding 30 times the risk of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children.


As would be expected, vaccinated children did have lower likelihood of two vaccine-preventable illnesses compared to unvaccinated children: chicken pox (7.9% vs. 25.3%), and pertussis (2.5% vs. 8.4%), but the scientists found no significant differences in rates of other vaccine-preventable illnesses like hepatitis A or B, measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, meningitis or rotavirus. The study suggests that fully vaccinated children may be trading the prevention of certain acute illnesses (chicken pox, pertussis) for more chronic illnesses and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) like ADHD and Autism.
Despite numerous requests over the years from parents and vaccine safety advocates for just this type of research, the corrupted CDC has failed to act...

This video you must watch!

Thursday, April 13, 2017

THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES

Alois Kolar



I believe the vaccine issue is perhaps one of the greatest issues of our time. It’s not about being pro or against vaccines; it’s about educating ourselves to make informed decisions for our health.
 
Like it or not, we’re living in the age of vaccines.  And especialy in USA pharmaceutical companies (BigPharma, fully supported by all ex USA governments, especially by regime of Barack Hussein Obama) are developing and marketing more and more every year — for all, for children, for adults, for men, for women, for cats, for dogs everything in the name of false science, useless intellectuals and totally brainwashed population.

We have a powerful 7 days coming for you with The Truth About Vaccines, and this information is vital for parents to have to fully understand the vaccine issue and make the best decision for their families.


Here is a sneak peak of the critically important topics each of the seven episodes will address:

Episode 1: The History of Vaccines, Smallpox, Vaccine Safety & the Current CDC Schedule
Episode 2: What's in a Vaccine?  Are Vaccines Effective? … and ... What About Polio?
Episode 3: In Depth Analysis of the MMR and DTaP Vaccines & Vaccinating for the Greater Good
Episode 4: Examining Influenza, the HIB and Pneumococcal Vaccines & Herd Immunity
Episode 5: Considering the HPV and Hepatitis B Vaccines, SIDS & Shaken Baby Syndrome
Episode 6: A Closer Look at the CDC, Chicken Pox and Rotavirus Vaccines & Retroviruses
Episode 7: Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis & Fundamental Freedom of Choice.


Here it is - Episode 1: The History of Vacccines, Smallpox, Vaccine safety

Episode 3: In Depth Analysis of the MMR and DTaP Vaccines & Vaccinating for the Greater Good

Lendava - Slovenia, 13.04.2017

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

VEGAN BURGER

Alois Kolar

Even your highly intelligent BFF can get things wrong! I've fallen for this. Once or twice... 

Just because your friend trusted a company that made a beautiful looking product and your friend thinks it's healthy doesn't mean they have done their homework. 


If it's too good to be true, then it probably is. Just remember, most of us love our raw and healthy foods but we have those things that we love and don't want to give up. It's likely that a lot of your health minded friends will too. Don't trust that a food is 'healthy' just because your "super healthy" friend does...

Your vegan burger might be cruelty free which is great, but it might also be a load of chemicals, additives, GMO produced junk laced with sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, bad salt and hydrogenated oils and more. Foods with these ingredients are no longer foods but food-like products. Sure you can use them to get yourself past a craving if you need to, but make sure you eat loads of high water content, fresh, whole, raw, and preferably organic foods to help your poor body cope with the onslaught of other things!



Excellent grapes from Lendavske Gorice,
Lendava, Slovenia
While it's largely believed that only people suffering from celiac disease react to gluten you only have to talk to anyone who has stopped eating gluten to see that this isn't true. After 10 years in the raw food industry, one of the most consistent reports we've had here is how wonderful people feel when they cease eating grains even if they are not diagnosed with celiac disease.
To be a vegan means not quite a lot for your health (it's good for animals, but not for you), we are biologically, physiologically and anatomically speaking frutarians (fruit eaters, nuts and seeds eaters), not vegan burger eaters or pasta, pizza and bread eaters and especially not healthy soy eaters
You as a vegan should know that cooking, baking food creates the toxins that cause disease - including cancer.
Probably you ask yourself, why "doctor" don't tell you this very important thing,the reason is that those studies are financed for one reason only: to make money. These chemical-pharmaceutical companies - including medicine "doctors" are not there to make you healthier, they are just there to make money, by "exploring pharmaceutical solutions". They don’t want you to know the causes of diseases and prevent them, they just want you to buy their drugs. And since these are commercial companies, it would be unfair to expect any differently, wouldn't it? The main problem is, that "our healthcare system" relies on findings from such scientific studies, mostly financed by pharmaceutical companies, either directly or indirectly (sponsoring of universities). This system is therefore 'designed' to make you more dependent on drugs than to prevent disease. 
Do think about it, please...

Once again: By heating whatever food, hundreds of different mutagenic substances originate. The more protein that food contains, the more mutagenics originate due to cooking etc. If we only live long enough, these substances will cause cancer.

As with vegan foods, Gluten Free foods can be overly processed and full of other products that are not going to help your physical well-being. Read the label at all times, but much better solution for you is to change your eating habits into raw fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds with at least three main meals per day and two snacks between main meals. 
Please, do not be naive and eat twice or even once a day - in this case you would shorten your way to cemetery...

My advice: do not eat this non (vegan) food; if you truly want to be healthy, do eat raw. Raw fruits, ve
getables, nuts, seeds, home prepared fruit or vegetable juices and change your lifestyle completely. 
For such kind of food we humans are biologically the most adopted for.
Well, this is it... ;-)

Piran - Slovenia, 13. 09. 2016.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

MEDICAL DOCTORS' IGNORANCE OR BALLERINA SYNDROME

In July 1981, the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine published an extensive study made of ballerinas by the Harvard School of Public Health. The Harvard School is mystified by a phenomenon known as “Terpsichore’s Syndrome” or “Dancer’s Syndrome.”


What is this syndrome?
It is “delayed” menarche, irregular or nonexistent “menstruation” and other “abnormalities” among ballerinas. Many ballerinas do not start “menstruation” until 18 or later and even then a very high proportion “menstruate” only infrequently.
First, let’s understand what these researchers of the Harvard School of Public Health mean by menstruation.
They do not mean the “sloughing off of the menses” which is what menstruation is, but “bloody discharge” which is not menstruation even though it accompanies menstruation almost universally in women of childbearing “age” in the modern world.
The article is primarily devoted to “reasons” and hypotheses as to why delayed menarche or menstrual
abnormalities are characteristic of ballerinas. If the researchers had been looking on a broader scale they would have researched the subject more and discovered this same syndrome among the following: female tennis players, runners, swimmers, gymnasts, and in fact, all female athletes who exercise regularly and consistently. Further they would have found this syndrome among primitive females in certain areas of the world, most notably among Hunza women and among women who live thoroughly in accord with our biological adaptations per the health system advocated by Life Science!
If the Harvard School researchers had looked even farther, they might have noted that female domesticated dogs and cats often have bloody menstruation whereas their wild relatives do not.
Does not all this evidence begin to paint very plainly that the medical concensus on the subject is off-base?
In trying to explain why ballerinas do not have “normal” menarche and menstruation the following hypotheses were offered:
  1. Late maturers choose to be ballet dancers.
  2. Ballerinas are undernourished.
  3. Hard physical exercise delays puberty.
  4. The low fat/high lean ratio of body tissues may delay menarche and cause menstrual disturbances.
We’ll comment on these “reasons” and hypotheses after presenting the gist of yet other discussions held at the Harvard School of Public Health. These discussions focused on the physiological agencies that triggered the onset of puberty.
The foremost hypotheses advanced were as follows:
  1. Puberty is a physiological change controlled by an independent neurologic clock genetically encoded.
  2. Puberty onset is triggered by a biological signal when a specific weight or body composition is reached.
In presenting these hypotheses the health officials made an observation that has a very vital bearing on the study: it was noted that ballerinas who had an injury that prevented further dancing very soon thereafter realized menarche and/or “normal menstruation.”
Let’s examine these hypotheses one by one in the light of established biological principles and see what truths, if any, have emerged from this study.
Saying “late maturers” choose to be ballet dancers obviously wins the dunce’s award! You might as well say that people not inclined to be ballet dancers choose to mature early. Such an asinine observation implies that females have preset menarche times which would start from nine to nineteen years and only mothers whose daughters’ menarche are set for the upper teens enroll their daughters in ballet.
But this first suggestion “late maturers choose to be ballet dancers” is flatly contradicted by the observation that ballerinas who sustain debilitating injuries speedily begin menarche. Don’t these researchers see their own inconsistencies? Why do “late maturers” become early maturers when they are injured?
Because ballerinas eat frugally does not justify saying they are undernourished, as the article implies. Ballerinas exercise long and hard. As any fan of ballet or other dancing will tell you, ballerinas are wonderful specimens of superb femininity, fitness, beauty and health.
If our researchers wanted to see the effects of undernourishment among young women, they had only to observe certain-parts of India where undernourishment is perpetual. There, young girls consistently menstruate at ages eight to ten! America’s average age of puberty onset is now ten to twelve! Does this observation point to undernourishment or something else as a cause of “late onset of puberty”? Obviously this hypothesis is unwarranted conjecture.
“Hard physical exercise delays puberty.” is another witless statement though it is closer on target than the first two statements. Yes, exercise does “cause” delay of menarche and it does “cause” abnormal and irregular menstruation. I have put “cause” in quotation marks because these researchers are using the word “cause” in a misleading sense.
The statement “the low fat/high lean ratio of body tissues may delay menarche and cause menstrual disturbances” is as illogical as the attribution of undernourishment. Skinny and malnourished young Indian girls begin menarche and menstruation at eight to ten years with the same dispatch our young girls enter into it at ten to twelve years of age. So it is plain our researchers are wrong here too.
The next two hypotheses about what triggers puberty are without a great deal of relevance although both contain some truth.
Puberty does, indeed, occur in humans and all other animals in clocklike fashion at almost identical ages where environmental and extrinsic body factors are more or less the same. But, where these factors differ the time of menarche also differs. Just what are these factors that cause onset of menarche? Are they inherent factors or environmental factors or an interaction of both? Menarche, the onset of puberty, is genetically encoded— that’s why, obviously, some animals reproduce within a year and others cannot reproduce until an age of many years has been attained. But, when we have members of a given species arriving at menarche with such wide variations as 8 to 18 years of age, something strange is involved. Mother Nature doesn’t work that way—ask any farmer and he will tell you how close are his hens in age when they begin egg-laying or his heifers in their first heat.
The hypothesis that the onset of puberty is genetically encoded, controlled by a biological clock, does not account for such a wide variation of age on onset.
Another theory is that puberty onset is triggered by a biological signal outside the central nervous system when a specific weight or body composition is reached. Again, this hypothesis is more or less on target. Though an obviously true hypothesis, these researchers do not come close to the real reason why this hypothesis might be correct.
What is the real story?
Those who have perspicaciously examined and studied the phenomenon of menstruation (the sloughing off of the menses periodically in preparation for ovulation) observe that it is abnormal for this to be accompanied by blood-letting.  Yet menstruation accompanied by bloody discharge is abnormal, then why is it so universal?
Let’s establish one thing right away. Blood discharge is, indeed, abnormal—it is unnatural. We do not observe in nature a scheme for blood-letting, discomforts, disability or disease under natural conditions. Obviously some unnatural conditions exist among creatures who exhibit variances to nature’s norm.
The medical establishment and those with a medical orientation in our society regard bloody menstruation as normal and are mystified and perplexed when that periodic bloody discharge fails to put in its regular appearance. What they regard as normal is obviously unnatural by the criteria we have cited. Hence there are obviously some flaws in medical premises or assumptions on this subject.
Those who have studied the subject know that the age of onset of puberty is advancing one month every five years in our society. Can it be that our genetic encoding is evolving to make puberty in humans an ever-earlier occurrence? Why is not the same accelerated appearance of menarche occurring in wild animals too?
To arrive at the answer, all our researchers had to do was to go back to our biological basics. The foremost instinct in animal life, humans included, is preservation of self. In certain circumstances a secondary instinct becomes primary: the survival of kind or species. Nature has built into creatures a multitude of safeguards to insure against extinction.
Hence we witness under a broad spectrum of circumstances or crises this salient factor, survival of kind, (either family, tribe, community, nation, race or species) takes precedence over personal survival. This happens on a biological basis as well as on a psychological basis. Thus the instinct for reproduction of kind often asserts itself with untoward emphasis when a life-endangering situation
exists. This is most dramatically expressed by a farmer’s adage: “plants that are sickly go to seed quickly.”
This sheds some light on the dilemma the researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health got themselves into. They failed to take cognizance of basic principles that appertain within the biological realm.
Thus it becomes apparent that the earlier the onset of menarche and reproductive faculties, the more a life-endangering situation exists for the organism. And, likewise the longer menarche requires to put in an appearance, up to a point, the more normal and salubrious is the condition of the subject organism.
Once this salient fact becomes a part of our thinking, the sooner we will begin to comprehend what the “ballerina syndrome” is all about. Ballerinas’ extraordinary fitness is evident to all. Fitness and health are practically synonymous terms. Thus we begin to ascertain that menarche and “menstruation” (the kind accompanied by bloody discharge) has something to do with the woman’s state of health.
A mere 150 years ago our female forebears (young women who arrived at menarche) experienced puberty at an average age of fourteen to fifteen years. In some European countries the average age was sixteen to seventeen years. The same held for some Asiatic countries, notably those ultra-healthy Hunzas whose menarche was not reached until sixteen to seventeen years of age.
The principle is thus revealed: the healthier the female the later menarche occurs, which happens when the genetically encoded biological clock decrees it. The less healthy the female, the sooner menarche occurs to offset the possibility that poor health will evolve into infertility.
In the case of the ballerinas as well as women athletes we witness but one thing: the phenomenon of health. This contrasts with a medically established “norm” of a population that is, on average, pathological!
Lendava - Slovenia, 2016.08.09

YOU HAVE JUST BEEN POISONED

By M. BENTON


Have you had a headache recently? Maybe you’ve felt tired or nervous or irritable for no particular reason. Or has there been some pain somewhere in your body, but you didn’t know just where?
Well, consider yourself poisoned—pesticide poisoned, that is.
You may be a victim of pesticide poisoning if you’ve experienced any of these symptoms lately: fatigue, aching bones, headache, indeterminate body pains, chronic tiredness, mental confusion, fever or other “cold-like” and “flu-like” symptoms.
Many times you may be poisoned by pesticide residues in your food and just not realize it. Pesticide poisoning goes virtually undetected by doctors because they rarely recognize the symptoms for what they are. Since you may not have become immediately sick after eating pesticide-contaminated food, you may not connect your negative feelings with the poisons you just ate.
While few people do know that many aches, upsets and illnesses are pesticide-related, over 500,000 people each year are seriously poisoned by pesticides each year—over one every minute.
Another 5,000 people die each year as a direct result of pesticides. Up to 5 million or more cases of pesticide poisonings go unreported or undiagnosed each year.
Everybody in the world—no matter where they live or what they eat—have pesticide residues throughout their body. That’s right—you’ve been poisoned!

Pesticides and Your Health

Pesticides seem especially damaging to the liver and spleen. Blood disorders such as leukemia, anemia and “tired blood” have increased with their use of pesticides. More leukemia cases are reported in the farm states that have had the highest amount of pesticide spraying.
Liver disorders such as hepatitis, jaundice and other ailments have skyrocketed with pesticide use. “It is now believed,” says Dr. W. Coda Martin, “that the greater number of hepatitis cases may be caused by DDT on the leaves of green vegetables.”
In 1969, Miami University did a study on cancer patients. A random selection of terminal cancer patients revealed that they had exceptionally high pesticide residues in their liver, brains and fatty tissues.
Although we can’t blame all our nation’s ills on pesticide use, pesticide poisoning is real. Stillbirths, miscarriages- and deformed babies occur most where pesticide use has increased the most rapidly.

Why Is This Happening?

The government is doing a miserable job of keeping pesticides out of our environment. Agribusiness aggressively promotes the use of these poisons for profit—even when they know they are killing people! Does this sound incredible, do you still believe that people are crying “wolf”? Well, read on.

Poisons For Profits

In 1977, workers at a pesticide plant in California discovered that they had been made sterile due to exposure to DBCP (a pesticide). Some of the companies making this poison suspended production while the government investigated. One company, called Amvac, did not.
Amvac told its stockholders that although DBCP had suspected “carcinogenic and mutagenic” properties, they would continue to sell it. They explained: “It was our opinion that a vacuum existed in the marketplace that (we) could temporarily occupy…(and) with the addition of DBCP, sales might be sufficient to reach a profitable level.”
Finally, after two years that it was determined DBCP did indeed cause sterility, the Environmental Protection Agency banned its use in this country. So, do you think you’re safe? Nope. Read on.

Deadly Bananas

Although DBCP is now banned in this country because it is believed to cause cancer and sterility, there are no restrictions on selling this pesticide to foreign countries.
Banana plantations in Costa Rica, Honduras and Ecuador buy DBCP from us. They use it to kill soil-dwelling worms that attack the bananas. Then they ship the sprayed bananas back to the United States where you eat them.

Foreign Killers

Imported produce is more likely to be highly poisoned than food grown in our country. The reason? “Americans eat with their eyes,” a Mexican agribusinessman said. “They won’t buy a fruit or vegetable with any insect marks or blemishes, so we spray them heavily. About four times as much spray as we use on our domestic crops. No insects ever touch that food.”
And probably neither should you.
Strawberries from Mexico often have residues of 60 or more pesticides. A single head of imported lettuce had 11 different poisons used on it.
Bananas from Central and South America had 45 “allowable” (by FDA standards) pesticides plus 25 prohibited pesticides and 37 additional poisons that are not normally detected by FDA tests. Mexican tomatoes had 53 “allowable” pesticides, another 21 banned pesticides, and an additional 28 unidentifiable sprays and poisons. The FDA frequently finds mysterious, unknown poisons in imported foods no doubt illegal pesticides that were manufactured and sold by the United States.
The FDA rarely, seizes these poisoned food shipments or refuses them entry. Instead, they remove a small sample of the food for testing and send the rest to the marketplace. By the time they run the test and discover the deadly pesticides, the food is already in your stomach.
During one recent 15-month period, half of the imported food identified as heavily pesticide-contaminated was sold without penalty or warning to the American public.
The government is not protecting you. The pesticide manufacturers certainly won’t protect you. It’s up to you.

What Can You Do?

You cannot avoid pesticide poisoning. By now, the waterways, the soil and the rain are so polluted by them that it will take at least 20 to 40 years to eliminate them from the environment even if we start today.
Is it hopeless? Do we have to sit back and allow ourselves to be poisoned for someone else’s pocket-book? No. You can take actions today that may save the lives and health of all the people and wildlife on this planet. Here’s how:

Economic Action

As much as possible, boycott the giants of agribusiness who are chiefly responsible for pesticide production and use. Buy local and organic produce as much as possible. Support the small, independent grower.
Tell your local grocery store that you want more homegrown and unsprayed produce. Spend your dollars wisely so as to give little support to the food industries that use poison for profits.

Political action

Let your congressmen at the state and federal levels know about your deep concern for the pesticide problem. Write letters, emphasizing that their actions in this one area will greatly determine how you will vote.
Protest the exportation of pesticides to other countries. These poisons find their way back to your dinner table. Insist that federal agencies be more responsive and stringent in monitoring pesticide levels. Tell your representatives that you want more funding for environmental protection agencies.
A list of consumer action groups that are lobbying for stricter pesticide control is included’ with this article. Contact them for additional information about how you can help.

Consumer Action

You can consume less pesticides by growing your own food. If you have extra room, grow additional poison-free food for friends and relatives. However, realize that pesticides are now throughout the environment. Rains carry deadly poisons from around the world and deposit them in your garden. Even homegrown and organically-grown food is now being pesticide contaminated due to our polluted waterways. You can’t run away anymore from the problem—it’s being brought home to you, like it or not.
If you can’t garden or raise your own food, grow sprouts. These are virtually poison tree food and may be had fresh all year round. Sprouting dried seeds and grains can help you consume less supermarket poisoned foods.

A Good Diet Can Help!

Yes, you can eat certain foods and avoid others to reduce your pesticide poisoning. By wisely choosing your foods, you can consume up to 100 times less poisons than the average person. Here’s how:
  1. Avoid meat and dairy products. Pesticide residues are 16 times to several hundred times higher in meat and milk products than in fresh fruits and vegetables.
    Animals must eat 16 pounds of plant material to produce one pound of flesh. The poisons in the feeds and plants are concentrated in the fat and vital organs of the animal. When you eat the meat, it’s like getting a super-concentrated dose of pesticides. The pesticides that are bonded in the animal fat is even more difficult for the body to handle than the pesticides found in the fruits and vegetables. When pesticides are subject to heating as well (as in the cooking of the meat), additional dangerous chemical changes occur.
    The former secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Robert Finch, said: “If strict enforcement of pesticide residues in meat, dairy products and eggs existed, I fear we would have to become a nation of vegetarians.” Actually, the fear should be that we won’t become a nation of non-meat eaters.
    Although DDT contamination of fruits and vegetables has now slightly decreased since the limited 1973 ban, pesticide poisons in livestock, poultry and fish have steadily increased. Animal fat is a storehouse of poisons. The more fat in your diet, the more poisons. It’s that simple.
    Remember too that it is now impossible to consume any dairy food in any form and not receive dangerous levels of DDT. High-fat dairy products are, of course, the worst.
  2. Limit or reduce grain products. Grain farming is most conducive to heavy spraying and mono-crop farming. After a few years of continual spraying, the grain fields become saturated with high doses of pesticides.
    The safest grain to eat is wild rice. Corn and wheat are among the heaviest sprayed.
  3. Buy organic food or grow your own. Obviously if you grow or buy unsprayed food, you’ll get less pesticides. Remember, however, that as long as there are pesticides used anywhere in the world, your food will still be contaminated. The only sure way to prevent pesticide poisoning is to make certain that these chemicals are not released into the environment in the first place.
  4. Use careful food preparation. You can remove some surface pesticides by washing them with a harmless soap to remove oil-based poisons, vinegar or lemon juice to remove alkali-based sprays, and soda for acid-based sprays. Make sure all such washed produce is then cleansed with water (preferably distilled to avoid other contaminants).
    You can peel some fruits and vegetables (especially waxed produce). You should remove outer leaves of green vegetables.
    Once again, however, these are not sure protection measures. Most pesticides are not on the surface of the food, but are throughout the entire system of the plant. The poisons may be entirely intercellular and none may be on the surface at all.
  5. Avoid most imported produce. Food that is imported has often been more heavily sprayed and with poisons banned in this country. This is not always true, however. For instance, many foreign countries will not let U.S. produce come into their country because of the poisons we use. Oftentimes, the food you get inside these countries is safer than what is grown inside the U.S. It’s just that to produce high-cosmetic produce for Americans, the foreign countries heavily spray their export crops.
  6. Avoid produce that receive the highest amount of spraying. This is often difficult to determine, as pesticide use is not consistent for any crop across the country.  In general, “soft” fruits which are more prone to insect attack will usually be more heavily sprayed than those foods with a naturally protective layer or skin.
  7. Don’t worry. Strange advice after all these warnings, but you should realize that at this time, it is impossible to avoid all pesticides. Worrying does no good anyway; action is what is needed.
If you follow a good diet, you can be protected from most of the harmful effects of pesticides. For instance, uncooked foods present less of a problem to the body as it tries to separate the poisons from the food. If you cook your food, you’re creating chemical bonds with the poisons that may present difficulty. A little poison on your fresh fruits and vegetables won’t hurt you as much as the high amount of poisons most people get in the typical high-fat, high-meat American diet.
Fasting can help your body eliminate the pesticide poisons by burning up those fat deposits where the residues are stored. As these poisons are released during the fast, you may experience the usual symptoms of pesticide poisoning—nausea, headaches, irritability, etc. It’s uncomfortable, but fasting and/or the eliminating of this body fat may be the only way of ridding yourself of the pesticide load.

Fight Back!

Remember, you don’t have to sit back and be continually poisoned. You’re not helpless. You have to take action. You’re fighting for your life.
No one is immune from pesticide poisoning. We are killing the birds, the animals, the children and all life on our planet by the crazy, unjustifiable use of deadly pesticide poisons.
We have a chance. There are still people—people like you—who believe health, life and, well-being are more important than a few extra dollars for a poison manufacturer or for the chance to eat an “unblemished” apple.
But you can’t wait any longer. You’ve got to fight back—now —because with the next bite you eat, you’ve just been poisoned
Lendava - Slovenia, 09.08.2016

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

GERMS ARE OUR SYMBIOTIC PARTNERS

Alois Kolar

Aerobic soil bacterium
Bacteria are with us all the time, they are ubiquitous in both soil and water and as symbionts of all living organisms, including in our bodies. Most bacteria are minute, usually only 0.5-5.0 μm in their longest dimension, although giant bacteria likeThiomargarita namibiensis and Epulopiscium fishelsoni may grow past 0.5 mm in size. Bacteria generally have cell walls, like plant and fungal cells, but with a very different composition (peptidoglycans). Many move around using flagella, which are different in structure from the flagella of other groups.

Life without bacteria would be impossible in this Planet. Bacteria are often viewed negatively, given this group's connection to diseases. However, bacteria perform invaluable, beneficial functions in ecosystems, and also reflect harmony between living organisms in a number of ways. These include conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to forms that plants can use, exhibiting mutualism (a type of symbiosis in which both organisms in two interacting species receive benefit), and recycling nutrients through bacterial decomposition of dead plants and animals.

Well, medical science is a very strange science and it says that specific disease bacteria are commonly assumed to be primary cause of specific diseases. In reality these maligned microorganisms are our friends, they are scavengers that need food to reproduce themselves. They go into action immediately when there is a dangerous accumulation of toxic material which are threatening an organism integrity. They perform a useful function of cleaning up the mess and after their work is done, they resume more passive state.
A key function of bacteria in the ecosystem is in decomposition of living matter. As decomposers, bacteria feed on the tissues of dead organisms, breaking them down into nitrogen and carbon containing molecules. What they do not use as food can then be used by plants as nutrients. Indeed, one can view bacteria as key to both the beginning and end of the food chain, as they provide necessary nutrients for the start of the food chain and also breakdown the organic matter at the end of the food chain.

It's not possible to deny that bacteria are intimately associated with many serious diseases, but they contribute secondary or tertiary complicating factors, because elaborate certain powerful toxins and these factors are add to the primary causes for developing disease. They are not fundamental and primary causes as medical science (medicine "doctors") and many other people believe.

"Bacteria are not fundamental and primary causes as medical science (medicine "doctors") and many other people believe."

Some bacteria, including E-coli, help people and animals to digest food and help in providing vitamins. Ruminants, such as cattle and sheep, contain large numbers of bacteria in the rumen to help in digestion of grass by the degrading cellulose into nutrients that can be absorbed. Ruminants rely on the bacteria, since they lack these essential digestive enzymes themselves.

Beyond organic matter, bacteria can also degrade metal cyanides from industrial sites, help in cleaning up nuclear waste, recover metal from low-grade ores, and degrade some pesticides.

Bacteria are also key for nitrogen fixation. Plants require nitrogen to build protein, but cannot use atmospheric nitrogen directly, despite its high concentration in the air (78 percent). In soil and even plant roots, nitrogen-fixing bacteria help convert nitrogen into a usable form, such as nitrates and ammonia, by a process known as nitrogen fixation. This serves to provide an easily absorbable form of nitrogen for many plants. For example, in legume plants, such as peas and clover, microorganisms help in the transformation of molecular dinitrogen gas, converting it to usable nitrogenous compounds.


The disease condition is, that creates an environment favorable to the mutation of bacteria into those associated with that particular disease and favorable to their proliferation and increasing virulence. The disease condition springs from improper living that begets toxicosis as a primary cause of disease. There is no denying that in the disease process their work as a scavengers is not unpleasant or even exhausting to the host, but it is natural – it is necessary for the preservation of health and life. After the cleansing is complete, the organism again makes its energies available for normal life activities.

Long time ago in 1860, the famous nurse Florence Nightingale published an
Florence Nightingale, the nurse
attack on Germ theory of disease and she said: “Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another. Is it not living in continual mistake to look upon disease as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly Nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves? I have seen with my eyes and smelted with my nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been caught but must have begun. True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows with unremitting attention to the patient are the only defense a true nurse either asks or needs. The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases, there are specific disease conditions only!”

And she was right also!

Therefore, in all epidemics (mass sickness) there are more cases of various other diseases than of the one “epidemic disease”! 

Let us take a closer look on epidemics

People who have maintained and internal state of cleanliness through correct
The food we are biologically, physically
the most adopted for
habits of eating and living (healthy lifestyle), do not need the disease process, because it cannot develop unless the toxic conditions for disease exist. Habits o living that waste nerve energy result in inhibition of secretion and excretion and consequent self-poisoning. The part of the organism laden with toxins is the first to react, but the effect is general – all the organs and structures of the organism suffer the impairing effects. The body ejects its not yet eliminated waste products by means of a crisis of acute disease, that means that the toxins are expelled vicariously through the channels not normally utilized (mucus membranes, skin). So, the disease is a process of detoxification and recovery, it is remedial and beneficial, it is self-preservation although does expend great reserves of energy during the process. Drugs and vaccines destroy natural “immune system” to expel toxins, symptoms of “disease” vanishing but disease – toxicosis exist further and more and more toxins are going to accumulate. In this way we are waiting on the bigger health crisis - with some other name (diagnose) in dead Latin language... 
An average healthy person with un-contaminated bloodstream not need to be concerned about being subjected to a contagious disease. This is not true with a person of low vitality and therefore high accumulation of metabolic waste productions. Bacteria or germs of such person stimulated into activity by the devitalized elements upon which they thrive, when transferred to the mucous membranes or tissues of another person equally toxic may be assumed to begin work immediately and in the same manner as on the first carrier. 

"An average healthy person with un-contaminated  bloodstream not need to be concerned about being subjected to a contagious disease."

This is in fact is a true explanation of contagion and one may say that germ precipitates the disease or excites it in the person to whom the germs are transferred, serums or drugs will only help add to the general toxic load, therefore instability result in serious harm even thought they may apparently modify or suppress a local or general pathological process.

La Playa Punta Brava, Tucacas - Venezuela, 2012

Saturday, February 20, 2016

THE GERM THEORY

Alois Kolar, B.HSc.

The germ theory of disease is the premise upon which is superimposed a tremendous network of medical procedures and their huge business (together with chemical-pharmaceutical industry) in our time.

French chemist Louis Pasteur was born on December 27, 1822, in Dole, located in the Jura region of France. He grew up in the town of Arbois, and his father, Jean-Joseph Pasteur, was a tanner and a sergeant major decorated with the Legion of Honor during the Napoleonic Wars. An average student, Pasteur was skilled at drawing and painting. He earned his bachelor of arts degree (1840) and bachelor of science degree (1842) at the Royal College of Besançon and a doctorate (1847) from the École Normale in Paris.

The germ theory says that disease is due solely to invasion by specific aggressive microscopic organisms, what means that specific germ is responsible for each disease. All these microscopic microorganisms are capable of reproduction and transportation outside of an organism. It was founded on the assumption that germs are specific and unchangeable in their structure and chemical characteristics.

Eminent modern bacteriologist and Pulitzer Prize Winner in 1968, Dr. Rene Dubos contradicted to this assumption by showing that virulence of microbial species is variable.

Louis Pasteur in 1880 admitted his mistake. Coworker of Pasteur Dr. Duclaux wrote Pasteur

nearly at 60 years of his age discovered facts, which were not in accord with his previous conception, that germs of disease were unchangeable. He found that microbial species undergo many transformations. This discovery destroyed the basis for the germ theory.

Germs do not cause disease, already in 1914 M.D. Mr. E. C. Rosenow of the Mayo Biological Laboratories in Rochester, Minnesota - USA describes his demonstration that streptococci could be made to assume all the characteristics of pneumococci pneumonia germs, simply by feeding them on pneumonia virus and making other minor alterations in their environment, when the procedure was reversed, they quickly reverted back to pus germs. 

No matter of the type of germs, in all cases they quickly mutated into other types always, when their environment and food were changed. All his experiments were reported in Journal of the Infectious Diseases 1914, Vol. 14, pages 1 to 32.

Two bacteriologists in New York made similar experiments, converted cocci into bacilli and vice versa…

From these experiments shows that specific bacteria do not produce specific disease symptoms. It is the environment and the type of soil which determines the type of bacteria that proliferate!

In 1762 a Viennese physician M. A. Plenciz published the first Germ Theory of Infectious Diseases. According to Dr. Leverson of England, in 1860 Pasteur took a credit for the experiments and ideas of others, plagiarizing and distorting their discoveries. He said that Pasteur became identified as originator of germ theory just because of his strong personality, and enthusiasm.

Claude Bernard and Pasteur had many debates on importance of the microbe and the

internal environment and Bernard disputed the validity of the germ theory maintained, that the general condition of the patient organism was the principal factor of disease, but his idea was largely ignored by the medical "profession".

Even Louis Pasteur was a chemist and knew very little about biology and life processes, he was a respected and influential man, also because of his father. 
His powerful influence on his contemporaries, his phobic fear of infection, in malignity and belligerence of germs had reaching consequences on the men of science. 
Thus was born the long period of fear of germs, bacilli, bacteria, huge chemical-pharmaceutical-medical business which exist and grows even in this time. ;-)

Around 1880 Louis Pasteur discovered facts which were not in accord with his previous conception that disease germs were unchangeable. He finds out that microbial species can undergo many transformation, so this discovery destroyed the basis of germ theory. Since a coccus (pneumonia germ) could change to a bacillus (typhoid germ) and back again, in fact, any germ could turn into another and their virulence could be altered, the whole theory exploded. Well, since than Pasteur had changed his direction, his more reasonable conception of the cause of disease as given by Dr. Duclaux was, that a germ ordinarily kept within bounds by natural laws, but when condition change and when its host is enfeebled, the germ was able to invade the territory which was barred to it up to that time. In fact this is a premise that healthy body is resistant to disease or better to say, not susceptible to it.

After he changed his outlook after the numerous experiments along the time Pasteur was convinced that controllable physiological factors were basic in the assessment of vulnerability to disease and he concluded: “The presence of a pathogenic agent in the body is not necessarily synonymous with infectious disease!” 

“The presence of the certain germs is not a proof that they are the cause of a disease!”

Louis Pasteur did reverse his scientific position and acknowledge that germs are not the specific and primary cause of disease and he abandoned the germ theory. He is reported to have said on his deathbed: “Bernard was right. The seed is nothing, the soil is everything!” 
Despite Louis Pasteur abandoned his early very immature and erroneous theory in 1880, it was accepted, developed fostered and perpetuated by others and this ultimate irony of medical science continue to this day as a huge business for chemical-pharmaceutical industry and medicine doctors.

Exactly in that time medicine claimed to be a science... ;-)

La Teoría de los Germenes

La Playa Punta Brava, Tucacas - Venezuela, 2012